研究生科技英语阅读课文翻译对照(36)

上月，旧金山通过了一项“手机知情权”法律，要求生产商在销售店明确标示每一部手机的辐射吸收率。同时，代表无线通讯产业的美国无线通讯协会，于7月23日在美国地方法院提出反对诉讼，阻止这项新法律的实行。其引用了美国食品与药物管理局（FDA）的报告“现有科学证据不足以证明手机与任何健康问题间存在联系”。
So far, the National Cancer Institute stands by the FDA. And neither the FCC nor the ICNIRP has recommended any changes in their present standards until there’s clear scientific evidence to demonstrate they need changing. 美国国家癌症研究所支持食品与药物管理局的结论。联邦通讯委员会与国际非电离辐射保护委员会也表示，在未有清楚科学依据证明现有标准需要变动前，他们将维持此标准。
That kind of clarity may be a long way off.
不过这些清楚科学证据似乎离我们还很远。
Take, for example, the findings released in May of INTERPHONE, the largest and longest study ever conducted on whether — and by how much — cell phone use increases the odds of developing brain cancer. Carried out by the International Agency for Research on Cancer — at a cost of some $25 million and nearly 10 years in the making — the study involved roughly two dozen scientists and research teams from around the world and some 10,000 patients and cell phone users from 13 countries. The study’s epic scope, however, only made its meager conclusions seem all the more unsatisfying.