「双语」例行记者会/RegularPressConference（2021-3-31）(37)

关于第二个问题，我刚才也已说过，此次来华的国际专家都是世卫组织挑选的，多数来自美国、英国、法国、澳大利亚等西方国家，中方没有对专家组组成提出过异议，所以怎么个干预法？我刚才也讲了，有些西方国家的确习惯于先入为主，只要他们没有达到自己的目的，得出的结论不是他们所想要的，他们就会扣上各种罪名，说不独立、不开放、不透明。但事实到底怎么样？他们自己做的怎么样？
On your second question, like I said just now, the international experts who came to China this time were selected by the WHO, and most of them came from the US, the UK, France, Australia and other Western countries. China has not raised any objection to the composition of the team. How could anyone say we intervene in this? As I said just now, some Western countries are really used to preconceived ideas. Whenever they fail to achieve their goals and see conclusions that are not what they want, they will make accusations of lack of independence, openness and transparency. But what is the truth? How are they doing on their own?
关于第三个问题，我刚才也回答过。联合专家组已经指出，溯源工作应基于全球视野，未来溯源工作不会局限于某一领域，需要多国多地开展。本次专家组报告也提出多项未来在全球开展的溯源任务。
As for your third question, I have just answered it. The joint mission has pointed out that the origin-tracing work should take a global perspective. The relevant work going forward will not be limited to a certain field, but needs to be carried out in multiple countries. The joint report also proposed a number of future origin-tracing tasks worldwide.