《玻璃先生》中的暗喻-不仅仅是关于超级英雄GLASS(8)

不是视它为一个教条式的原则，而是视为一个每一个人的个人挑战。
He argued that human beings are basically split between the finite and the infinite; between the earthly and the divine, and that our existential struggles are the result of us not properly relating ourselves to that relation.
他认为人类基本上分为“有限”和“无限”，尘世与神圣，而我们挣扎着存在，是由于我们没有恰当地将自己与这些关系联系起来。
He specifically warns against our tendency to search for the infinite within the finite, to search for absolute happiness within relative ends.
他特别警告我们不要在有限中寻找无限，不要在相对中寻找绝对的幸福。
Instead, he argues we should relate ourselves relatively to earthy matters, whilst simultaneously relating ourselves absolutely to the absolute end; to the infinite.
相反，他认为我们应该多建立与尘世中的世俗的联系，同时完全把自己和绝对的目的、无限联系起来。
And for Kierkegaard, this relation to the absolute can only be defined by the negative; which means that similarly to faith being defined by uncertainty, our connection to eternal happiness is defined by our suffering.
对于克尔凯郭尔来说，这种与绝对的关系只能用否定来定义，这意味着，就像信仰被不确定性所定义一样，我们与永恒幸福的联系是由我们的痛苦所定义的。