充满智慧、幽默的哈佛大学公开课-第7讲这是我的土地(13)

因为目前各国间并没有统一的专利权法和财产法，这会一直争议下去，直到达成共识，签订国际协议，设置通用规则。大家如何看待洛克关于私有财产，及其如何能早于任何政府法律而产生这一观点？
Is it successful? How many think it"s pretty persuasive?
能成立吗？有多少人认为它很有说服力的？
Raise your hand. How many don"t find it persuasive?
请举手。有多少人认为这没有说服力的？
All right, let"s hear from some critics. What is wrong with Locke"s account of how private property can arise without consent?
好吧，我们来听些批评意见。洛克关于私有财产无需他人同意就能产生这个观点，有何错呢？
Yes? Yeah, I think it justifies European cultural norms as far as when you look at how Native Americans may not have cultivated American land, but by their arrival in the Americas, that contributed to the development of America, which wouldn"t have otherwise necessarily happened then or by that specific group.
你来说？我认为它正义化了欧洲殖民的文化入侵，他是在辩称，之前印第安人可能并未耕种美洲土地，但欧洲殖民来到美洲后，促进了美洲的发展，如果不是欧洲的殖民，未必会有美洲今天的发展。
- So you think that this is a defense, this defense of private property in land. . . - Yes, because it complicates original acquisition, If you only cite the arrival of foreigners that cultivated the land. - I see. And what"s your name? - Rochelle. - Rochelle? - Yeah.