充满智慧、幽默的哈佛大学公开课-第7讲这是我的土地(15)

那你怎么看待他论点的正确性呢？因为如果你是对的，洛克此举将正义化从印第安人手中占领他们尚未圈定的土地，这一行为如果他的观点是正确的，那么洛克给出了占领土地的正当理由。如果他的观点是错的，那么洛克的辩护只是看似合理，但在道义上站不住脚。
- I"m leaning to the second one. . . - You"re leaning toward the second one. - But that"s my opinion as well.
All right, well, then, let"s—let"s hear-let"s hear if there is a defender of Locke"s account of private property, and it would be interesting if they could address Rochelle"s worry that this is just a way of defending the appropriation of land by the American colonists from the Native Americans who didn"t enclose it. Is there someone who will defend Locke on that point?
- 我比较倾向第二个说法。- 你倾向第二个说法。- 但这只是我的个人观点。好吧，那我们听听是否有人要为洛克的私有财产权观点辩护，如果能解决罗谢尔的担忧那就更好了，罗谢尔认为这只是在为美国殖民者占领印第安人手中尚未圈定的土地这一行为作辩护。有人来为洛克的这一观点辩护吗？
You are ready—are you going to defend Locke? Like, you"re accusing him of justifying the European basically massacre of the Native Americans.
你会为洛克辩护吗？你指责洛克正义化了欧洲殖民者屠杀印第安人的行为。
But who says he is defending it? Maybe the European colonization isn"t right. You know, maybe it"s the state of war that he talked about in his Second Treatise, you know.