充满智慧、幽默的哈佛大学公开课-第7讲这是我的土地(10)

事实上，他说如果我们认真看待自然权利，你就会意识到我们的自然权利也受到一定制约，该制约不管是来自上帝，或者是因为反思过什么是真正的自由，并认为真正的自由就是承认某些权利不可剥夺。这就是洛克与自由主义者之间的区别。但谈到洛克的私有财产观点时，他似乎又成了自由主义者的盟友。
Because his argument for private property begins with the idea that we are the proprietors of our own person and therefore, of our labor, and therefore, of the fruits of our labor, including not only the things we gather and hunt in the state of nature but also we acquire our property right in the land that we enclose and cultivate and improve.
There are some examples that can bring out the moral intuition that our labor can take something that is unowned and make it ours, though sometimes, there are disputes about this.
因为洛克对私有财产的论述以如下观点开始，我们拥有自己的所有权，因而拥有我们的劳动力，因而拥有我们的劳动成果，不仅包括我们在自然状态下采集或捕获的东西，还包括我们圈地并耕种改良过的那些土地的所有权。有些例子可以说明，在道德上通过劳动能使无主物品成为我们的所有物，尽管有时这一点颇具争议。
There is a debate among rich countries and developing countries about trade-related intellectual property rights. It came to a head recently over drug patent laws.
发达国家和发展中国家在贸易知识产权上存在着纠纷。最近尤为突出的，是在药品专利法上。