充满智慧、幽默的哈佛大学公开课-第7讲这是我的土地(9)

但洛克认为，我们获取到的财产不仅包括采集到的水果，捕杀到的鹿群，捕捉到的鱼群，如果我们犁田耕种并圈地种植了土豆，我们获取到的财产不仅是土豆，还包括那块土地。“一个人能耕耘、播种、改良、栽培多少土地和能用多少土地的产品，这多少土地就是他的财产。
He by his labor encloses it from the commons." So the idea that rights are unalienable seems to distance Locke from the libertarian.
这就像是他用他的劳动从公地圈来的那样。”因此权利不可剥夺的观点似乎将洛克和自由主义者区分开了。
Libertarian wants to say we have an absolute property right in ourselves and therefore, we can do with ourselves whatever we want. Locke is not a sturdy ally for that view.
自由主义者认为我们对自身拥有绝对所有权，因此我们能做任何自己想做的事。而洛克却不是完全支持这个观点。
In fact, he says if you take natural rights seriously, you"ll be led to the idea that there are certain constraints on what we can do with our natural rights, constraints given either by God or by reason reflecting on what it means really to be free, and really to be free means recognizing that our rights are unalienable.
So here is the difference between Locke and the libertarians. But when it comes to Locke"s account of private property, he begins to look again like a pretty good ally.